How large total output could possibly
be for an economy is determined by the quantity and quality of capital stock
and labor force. Capital stock includes natural and man-made resources such as
rivers, factories, mineral deposits, etc. The labor force includes that portion
of the population willing and able to work. The quality and quantity of capital
stock and labor force available varies widely across different nations. The
maximum output possible given these resources is called potential output.
If some portion of the
available capital stock or labor force is idle (unemployed), then acutal output
will be lower than potential output. When resources are idle, some amount of
output is lost and gone forever. Actual output will equal potential output when
full employment occurs. However, there will always be some amount of
unavoidable “frictional” unemployment. Since this level of unemployment is
unavoidabe, it is taken into account in potential output as the “full
employment level of unemployment” and corresponding full employment rate of
downtime of equipment, tools, factories, etc.
Potential employment grows
over time. This expansion is caused by:
·
Growth in the
quality and quantity of labor available
·
Growth in the
quality and quantity of capital stock available
·
Technological
advances
In any given period, some
amount of output will be dedicated to the production of new capital goods such
as new factories. This will increase the level of output in subsequent periods.
In addition, the newly produced capital goods will embody the latest technological
advantages. So a nation which devotes a high percentage of current output to
the production of new capital goods will win on two counts. Similarly, the
higher the proportion of current output applied to the training and improvement
of labor, the higher output will be in future periods.
The cruel dilemma facing
impoverished nations is that current output already fails to provide adequately
for the existing population, so diverting some resources to investment rather
than current consumption will create even more widespread problems of
starvation and poverty.
In the short run there is
little or nothing a government can do to affect a nation’s potential output.
Changes in potential output are long-run occurrences. However, actual output
can certainly be affected in the short run. The actual output or GNP is the sum
of the values of all final goods and services produced in the economy in a
year. There is also a corresponding flow of income to resource owners matching
the value of all final goods and services produced. In a simple model, ignoring
the government and international sectors, all resources are owned by households
and all goods are produced by firms. The firms hire resources owned by
households, and produce goods and services, which are then sold to the
households. This results in a circular flow of income.
GNP is the value of all final
goods and services produced. GNE (Gross National Expenditure) is the value of
total spending by the households. GNI (Gross National Income) is the value of
the factors of production used by all firms. Since these are all measuring the
same thing, they must all be equal. The symbol Y is used for the value of
GNP/GNE/GNI.
In this simple model, firms
can only produce two kinds of goods, consumption goods and investment goods:
GNP = CF + I. Households can also only spend their money in two
ways, consumption and spending: GNI = CH + S. CF is the
amount of consumption goods that firms plan to produce, while CH is
the amount of consumption goods that households plan to buy. When these are
equal, I=S—the resources devoted to the production of new capital goods are
equal to the savings rate of households. The propensity of households to save,
rather than spend, their money will have long term implications for economic
growth.
However, CF and CH are not always equal. Firms might
produce more consumption goods than households plan to buy, in which case goods
will be left unsold. Retailers will place smaller orders, and manufacturers
will reduce production. Taking all firms together, this results in a reduced
GNP. Since firms are producing less goods, they will require less resources,
resulting in a reduction of GNI. This will result in lower income for
households and will cause CH to fall even lower. A recession will
occur. GNI and GNP will continue to fall until inventories fall below desired
levels, at which point the process will reverse. However, the recession will
have been a period of wasted productivity, where actual output fell below
potential output, unemployment was in evidence, and society was less well off
than it could have been.
On the other hand, if
households want to buy more than firms are producing, retailers will experience
shrinking inventories as goods are sold faster to meet demand. They will
increase the size of their orders and manufacturers will increase production.
More resources will be required, resulting in higher household income, which in
turn results in even more demand. GNP and GNI will rise and a ‘boom’ will
result. The increase in GNP and GNI will be constrained only by potential
output. As this point is reached, demand continues to rise despite an inability
to increase supply to match, resulting in higher prices, which cause households
to buy less goods. Orders will decrease and the ‘business cyce’ will be
repeated.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment