Economic rent is the difference between the marginal product of a factor
of production in its most productive use and in its next best alternative. For
example, an unskilled worker working for a construction company might have a
wage of $20,000/year, which in a perfectly competitive market in equilibrium
will equal the value of his marginal product. His next best alternative is to
work for some other construction company, again for $20,000/year (the going
rate). His economic rent is therefore zero.
However, if it were
discovered that he had talent as a baseball player, he might be hired and put
under contract by a baseball team, at $50,000 per year. Since his contract
stipulates that he cannot play for any other team, his next best alternative is
still to work for a construction company at $20,000 per year. If the value of
his marginal product is now $50,000, then his economic rent is $30,000.
However, if he becomes a superstar player, and his presence increases ticket
sales by a million dollars a year, then the value of his marginal product is a
million dollars and his economic rent is $980,000. He is still only paid
$50,000, which is 5.1% of his economic rent. The baseball club keeps the other
94.9%. Eventually, his contract expires and he becomes a free agent. Other
baseball clubs will be willing to pay up to the value of his marginal product
and he will become a million-dollar ball player—but since his “next best
alternative” is now to be a million-dollar ball player for a different club,
his economic rent is again zero.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment